Freedom Domain |
||
WHY'S and WHEREFORE's - PART 2 from The Informer. Hopefully, after reading my Why’s and Wherefore’s, you will understand how an IRS agent works after I drew an analogy to the mechanic using a Motor Manual. If you don’t know what a Motor Manual is just visit a local garage, not a dealer because they may not have one, and ask to look at it and have them explain it. They will be more than likely to explain it. This is for all the people that have been charged with 26 USC 7212. First, as I stated in Part 1, all regulations must contain the Code Section and the Statutes at Large that gives the agent authority to apply that section to you. So he is working off of a regulation and applying that taxable activity listed in the regulation. The Statutes at Large state that a regulation must exist. Title 44 USC 1501 et seq. Is the other Law enacted by Congress that says this must happen in all cases. I will not go into Title 44 to keep this as simple as I can. When you read 26 USC 7212 you will not be able to see what taxable activity (or tax) that you have impeded the agent from doing his administrative duty. That is the reason that a regulation MUST be written. That goes back to 1 CFR and Title 44 wherein a regulation takes that vague and over broad statute wording and narrows it so the agent knows exactly what he is working with and applying to you. All you know is that you THINK the tax that you prevented them from doing their due administration of enforcing the REVENUE LAWS is the tax that you THINK applies to you. But that REVENUE LAW is not stated in the Code Statute 26 USC 7212. I have done an exhaustive search of CFR Titles 5, 12, 20, 26, 27, 29, 31 and 42 for section 26 USC 7212 and the Statute at Large. None of the above CFR titles contained the Code and Statute EXCEPT FOR 27 CFR. This is confirming what the Federal List of Statutes and the Parallel Table of Authorities lists. I lifted each and every one of those sections out of 27 CFR that the IRS REVENUE AGENT works with and applies to you. The reason I say REVENUE AGENT is that fact not all IRS agents can use this statute. Remember the old stills in the south and when they were raided it was said "Here come the REVENOORES?" A REVENUE AGENT deals strictly with ATF and COTTON products. So let us see what you have impeded the REVENUE AGENT in his due administration of the REVENUE LAWS. After reading this you will be about 200 points over your regular blood pressure. RIGHT FROM 27& CFR: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Treasury § 270.43 Interference with administration. § 270.383 Interference with administration. I had to add this next part to show you not only 7212 is used but all other sections listed herein of 26 USC as well as 31 USC. Other sections carry more 26 USC authority AND 31 USC which is financing (banking). Subpart J—Records and Reports § 275.24 Interference with administration. § 290.71 Interference with administration. § 295.24 Interference with administration. § 296.165 Interference with administration. § 296.202 Authority of ATF officers. If you are involved in any of the above then IRS may institute 26 USC 7212. If you are indicted under this Code Statute and are not involved in the REVENUE taxable activity then you have an immediate cross claim against the REVENUE AGENT AND the PROSECUTOR for filing false and fraudulent documents. You have to attack Service of process before anything else is said, otherwise the court gains jurisdiction. The reason is that without the proper venue, and that means that you are not involved in one of the regulatable items mentioned in the regs above how can they have duly served you process. Hell, it doesn't exist. Man, And remember, only these activities are lienable and leviable under 27 CFR, NOT any other Code because the regs do not allow them to do otherwise because only the ATF division of the government is allowed to use 26 USC 7212, and 6331 to 6334 for examples. And only 27 CFR 70.51 shows 26 USC 6020 as its authority. Again ATF. There is a historical reason for this and it goes all the way back to 1861 Income Tax and is expressed very nicely in the amended 1862 income tax Statutes at Large. File charges with the Inspector General of The IRS and with Loretta Agrett, the Criminal Tax division of the US Justice Department against the agents and all involved. They all know the law. They all know the regulations that apply. They are all criminals. You know that. Now here is the proof you need. Congress knows all this as they wrote the laws. Mark Twain said that the only true class of criminals known in the United States are CONGRESS. This is why Congress, holding hearings on IRS abuse is a sham to placate the people into making the people THINK , "Oh good they are finally doing something." Just the opposite is true my friends, they are screwing you over and over again. Congress could stop this all by abolishing the Office of the Commissioner of the IRS. They cannot abolish the Internal Revenue Service because Congress never created them. See the IRM 1100 Manual. You cannot abolish what to did not create. It is that simple. The Commissioner was the only office created. If you elect me a President of XYZ Corp. But never created XYZ Corp. Then what do I, as President, have control over? Absolutely nothing. However, I can hire District Directors and they can hire agents and then tell them to go out and collect taxes and no one is the wiser. There is not one IRS agent that has ever produced any documentation into any court that he is an employee of the United States and all the past articles I have written proves this to be so. They are private goons hired by the District Director and paid out of the District Directors budget. Every case that required evidence from IRS agents has produced only evidence that the IRS agent is "employed" by the District Director. Judges are just as guilty because they know the Law, they are educated and have superior knowledge of the Law. So why don't you people that have to go to court before a judge start challenging the judge by asking pointed questions that he is not qualified as a judge to tell the jury what the law is because he does not know the law? If he knows the law and you are hit with a 7212 or any other 26 USC that has regs written by ATF Title 27 CFR and not 26 CFR, then how can he inform the jury what the law is that you violated? It is an impossibility because HE HAS SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW and SUE SPONTE should dismiss the case. You apply the same questions to a lawyer forced upon you and see if he can answer the questions. If he can't then he is an incompetent lawyer. After going through many lawyers and not finding a competent lawyer, the judge, who himself is a private bar member lawyer, will force a public pretender upon you. At that point tell the judge that you have to question him, and if not allowed, then the judge has solicited one of his private bar members who is incompetent and that would be immediate reversible error on appeal. Let's start sticking it to them for a change people. I can't give you all the details so get together COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE and COMMUNICATE. Don't charge for what you do in this aspect because all your asses are on the line. Exchange of info is the worst fear of the establishment. Use your computers and the Internet against them. Their own laws will do them in. BUT, and I STRESS, BE ACCURATE with your research. Don't go off on some lame brain idea until you COMMUNICATE with others to get their point. I see one problem. That is the government will plant agents to disseminate bad info that will cause many to argue points that are not relevant. We have to weed these agents out. How? That is up to you all. I don't have all the answers. Then there are those that will want to "cash in" and make money. People I would trust with this are few and I will not name them but there are a few. Eliminate the money-makers by staying away from them and they will dry up. Is this a fight against the criminals by all of us? Sure, so why pay those that claim this new material I have just shown you is their domain? Everybody has to benefit from this info. This is just for starters. Sincerely |
||