2).
Q.  I have heard that we also need to file a "Security Agreement" like the one in "Cracking the Code" and the Sam Davis manuals that were around a while back. Are people still doing that?
A.  Some people are, some aren't. My understanding is that it isn't all that necessary. It isn't going to mean the end of the world if you don't, if that's what your getting at. As a true redeemer, the process taught by Roger, NO we do not file a security agreement, that would be considered "Testifying" which is a no-no.

3).
Q.  I have heard that you need to send paperwork to the Treasury along with your Birth Certificate. Then I have heard that we don't do that anymore. What is the correct answer?
A.  Well I have heard that Roger says that all of that was just getting out of hand and it was never intended to happen like that. The Treasury was getting overwhelmed with them and from what I gather now the CID are investigating the ones that are being done now by the people reading the "Cracking the Code" book. Roger says at one time that all of that was part of his own affairs that he was dealing with and other people started doing it too, and then it got confused with other things and so forth. But apparantly, it isn't necessary either, just like the "Security Agreement". In the beginnering that was done; however, being in the apprenticeship we have learned that we do not do it that way, we now can accomplish the same things through the local banks by a couple of different methods using sight drafts or acceptances that were ignored being deposited in the night deposit box at the banks with letters of instruction.

4).
Q.  What is wrong with the information in "Cracking the Code"? How come I keep hearing negative things said about it?
A.  Well, there are several things I could get into here. Mainly you have to understand that the author of the book published that book almost immediately after the information first surfaced about Redemption. The author has a background of some understanding of Commercial Law, but he thought that he knew what Roger was teaching, and he didn't, at all. What happened was a disasterous result. People started filing these papers by the hundreds and they were all "wrong", based on the info. in the book. The authors recommended some "form" papers to use and they were headed with things like "Constructive Notice" and they were phrases like "threats" and they included threats of "liens" and so forth. This is totally contradictory to what Roger is teaching. Liens are not a part of what this movement is about. And neither are "threats". Roger is a man who believes in "living in Grace", and I interprete that to mean something to the effect of not using their statutory system in any regards. When you use their "statutory" system, them you are on the same level as them, and locked into one side of the account. You begin to "argue", and this is also "dishonor" or "refusal". What Roger is talking about is "Acceptance". You cannot be an "Operator" and an "Executor" at the same time. It isn't possible.

5).
Q.  I have heard some people say that we don't even need to do a UCC-1, either. If not, then where is the "meat" in this thing, what is there to it if we don't really have to file any of this paperwork at all, and nothing is necessary except to "know your position"? I don't understand this. Could you please explain?
A.  I believe, and I think that Roger has said this that it is only a tool for you to get more comfortable with these matters and get a more confident and better understanding of who you are. But if you ever use a draft, you better have a UCC-1 filed properly. You are eligible to file a UCC1.  you do not need a UCC1 file first in order to accept something for value.  We are also eligible to accept anything filed against us that we find through UCC3 or UCC11 whereas fictions can't.

6).
Q.  I have heard over and over about people getting into trouble using these so-called "sight drafts" and I have even heard that Roger got into trouble before, using these. Why is he still doing it, and why are others getting into trouble, and why hasn't he gotten into any trouble for using them?
A.  I cannot get into the whole thing here but I will say a couple of things so people can get a better idea of what is going on here. First of all : THERE IS NO MONEY! - Now, once you understand that, you can start to think about what is going on here.  --  Apparantly, there are people out there trying to get money out of this program. They simply don't understand, there isn't any. Now, if we had a million dollars in federal reserve notes, would we really have a million dollars? NO! We would be liable for a million dollars to the federal reserve!!! That is "debt"!!!  -- Anytime you are in possession of "debt" instruments, you are liable, period. Even the checks or so-called credits in your bank account are actually "debt", because it is not "redeemed". When you cannot prove where it came from....When you cannot prove you are the "Original Issue", then you are handling "drug money"... You can't prove where it came from!!!  Before you can use this process like Roger or several others are at this time, you need to understand these principles thoroughly. If you are trying to get federal reserve notes, you are "liable" and you might even goto jail. When I "Accept" an offer from a vendor, then we have a "private contract". I can give them a draft too, which they could give to the IRS as a "Tax Credit" when they do their taxes. Because I can give them my "Exemption" and they will give me their "Deduction". Now we have an "Exchange" of equal value. But you see, they can add it imediately to their account as an asset because the "revenue" is recognized at the "point of sale" not when it is "collected". That is all I will say here on this.
Excellent


7).
Q.  What paperwork do I need to do if I get arrested or something comes at me from the government, like an offer?
A.  Accept it for Value by writing across the face of the instrument, signing it, dating it, and adding your Employer Identification Number. Do that with everything they throw at you, and don't argue with them or start a "controversy" in any way. Accept ALL their paperwork right there and hand it back to them. If they give you a copy, that is just fine. Don't refuse to give information or lie to them when they are booking you in with the standard questioning. Don't bond out! If asked oral questions about what you were doing, just stick to the 3 magic questions and the statement. When you go before the judge for arraignment, and he askes you how do you plead? Ask the 3 magic questions and give the final statement. They will either release you then, or shortly thereafter, or they may bind you over for a pre-trial. You may have to sit and wait, but most likely, unless it was something they consider very serious, they will release you soon afterward, and most likely within the 72-hour period for truth-in-lending. If you have to goto pre-trial, keep "acceping" everything and wait until they put the witness on the stand. Then when it is your turn, request a direct examination and start in with the questioning (3 magic questions), don't sway and don't make any statements or give testimony besides your last statement (request). If things don't go your way, just sit still and don't "expect" anything to happen that would indicate that what you are doing is working. Just sit assured that it is, because they have to "account" for you if they put you in jail, and if you have "accepted" everything, you have them by the b**s. Just remember they are masters at "bluffing". They might even tell you , you aren't getting out of here for 99 years, in order to try to scare you into submission. Wonderful

8).
Q.  Are there any other ways to apply this process in our society and obtain products from vendors without using "drafts" or federal reserve notes?
A.  Well something that is being done right now, is that people are "accepting" their credit cards for value and when they get a statement, they "accept" it, and once it is adjusted then they have a new credit line added, and they repeat the process. What this accomplishes is it "insulates" us from the handling of the instruments by doing everything through our "fiduciaries". They are the ones with the license in the industrial society, and they are "licensed" to handle it for us. That is just one of several applications being used. Make sure you always attach the receipts to the statement making the credit card company the witness.

9).
Q. What if I am injured by someone like a law enforcement officer and I want to sue or someone damages me in some way? How do I accept that and get some money out of it?
A.  Once again, there is NO MONEY! -- But what you can do, is "accept" the offer directly to the officer. The offer to "beat you over the head" or whatever, sent it to them. Send them a second request and a W-9 form request. When they don't respond, "accept" their refusal for value and put a value on it. Then the next step is to move them into "involuntary bankruptcy" and take their possession of their property if that is what you want to do. You can also accept the license they must have for value or medical bills etc for your damage.  They are all licensed (privileged) and
  responsible.  That is policy (insurance policy)

10).
Q.  I have heard different things about using the 8300 suspicious transaction forms and so forth. Can you tell me a little about the various methods of enforcement?
A.  Well, at first everyone thought we were supposed to fill these things out, and some people did and some people got into trouble over it. What we have learned is that if you are doing things the way they are supposed to be done (and unfortunately we are learning this by trial and error), the system will not retaliate. But from what I have gathered Roger tells people to give it to them to fill out, don't fill it out yourself. Request that they do it. Because everything you do is establishing evidence against them, the delinquent on the "tax return" to the principal. You don't care if they ignore it or whatnot, they have it and you requested they fill it out and send it in. When they don't they are in violation of their own duty because it is a suspicious transaction and they have got to make a return to the IRS. We don't care what they do or say, only what we do and say. Don't give "testimony". EVER!!!  We don't gather information, we provide it to the proper authority for them to investigate and prosecute.  They are the public servant with the license.