.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Letters By Leroy Schweitzer
" AN OPEN LETTER " By Political Prisoner Chief Justice Michael LeRoy (Shweitzer), Montana
FREEMEN--Nov. 1996
This letter is to show all the people why the so-called FREEMEN are in jail, the reasons will not be fully explained in one short letter, but those who have studied in Law will see the picture.
The greatest fraud in America was committed by the Bar association who nearly eradicated our supreme Court in its' exclusive, original jurisdiction under Common Law venue. Our People in
Justus township researched our supreme Court in its' own government as judicial branch of government who are not paid a public salary per se, but are paid only upon costs taxed against the losing party on the civil side of the court and costs taxed against the county on the criminal side of
the court, and these costs are billed at the "quarter sessions" after the cause was settled. This is relevant to ch. 40 of the Magna Carta.
The prevention against titles of nobility from entering our supreme Court is found in Constitution
of Montana eighteen hundred eighty nine, anno Domini at Article V, section twenty-six, where it
says the Legislative Assembly shall make no local or special laws in respect to our Courts of
Justice, our Constables, summoning and empaneling grand and petit juries, setting fines and punishments, changing the law of descent, creating franchises.
What the people do not realize is the difference between our General Congress assembled and the Legislative assembly. Our General Congress Assembled is none other than supreme Court sessions at the county court at the seat of government. It is proven in Constitution of Montana at Article XX, section six, where each and every county has a supreme Court seal. Only the
appellate branch sits at the State capital; our exclusive, original branch sits at county seat. John Bouvier proclaimed this truth in eighteen hundred fifty six, where he said every county clerk and recorder is
a supreme Court clerk. Our bench and bar are ch. 45 of Magna Carta, good and lawful men well versed in law and duly disposed to keep it. No attorneys.
Our supreme Court quorum consists of at least three qualified electors as found in national Constitution at Article II, sec. 2, cl. 2, and these are not United states citizens. The chairman is the president and the Senate are the two associate Justices. You will see this at 28 U.S.C. sec.1 under supreme court. The president named here is not Bill Clinton since he is executive branch and it is
not the Chief Justice William Renquist in Washington D.C. sitting in appellate branch of supreme Court. It is the chairman of the county commissioners and few there are in America who know
and understand these truths, but Justice John Paul Stevens knows.
We find roots in this organic truth in Deuteronomy 1:15-18 and 16:18-20. So, how do we
prove this to the slumbering giant, our Nation in North America ?
United States Code Title 28 is a great study guide if you read all footnotes, Historical Revisions, Amendments. Also study division of the courts where you find our law side verses the contract
side. Another clue is this: All Legislative Assembly created tribunals are contract courts only in the executive branch of government. Our Judicial branch of government in its' exclusive, original jurisdiction in Common Law venue is reserved to the people alone; no public officers on a public salary. It means no agent of the people sets our supreme Court since the agent is necessarily either executive or legislative; hence ch. 24 of Magna Carta, where we will not have any sheriffs, bailiffs,
or other of our hirelings who hear matters of the Crown. Title 28 U.S.C. sec.1251 agrees. Also
ch. 38 of Magna Carta re-affirms this seperation of powers where it says an executive officer on
his own bare saying cannot move our supreme Court. Fundamental law is separation of powers
and our supreme Court is dormant for lack of knowledge. We full well realize the Appellate
branch supreme Court is open but our exclusive original branch just re-opened and the Justices
are in jail. Yellowstone county jail, country of Montana, united states of America, with ample knowledge to teach these truths to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. this is one reason our qualified Justices' will not be allowed to testify in open Court for fear appellate Justices would then trade places for willful acts of treason. ! Nuff Said ? Please contact chief Justice LeRoy
Michael at above mailing location for further truths and where the proof is located. In Yahweh through our Savior Immanuel. ---Chief Justice LeRoy Michael, Freedom Center - c/o P.O. Box 80446, Billings, Montana state, zip code exempt.
OUR MANDATE IS VICTORY -A letter to Brother Joseph from LeRoy Michael Shweitzer--Special Prosecutor (FREEMEN)-Oct. 1997
Out of the blue, a jail guard asked two of our people at two seperate units, "What is going to happen to them now ?", so you know they have been told that we won our case! And the fact that the case against me in U.S.D.C. district of Minnesota, Third Division was dismissed. It was
brought by private parties concerning a warrant I had given them. Also, a banker in Indiana where our liens were discussed and there was talk about "pooling funds" to pay the liens. We caught the whole rotton bag of fish. Now the payback is hell !
Clinton is not making any nominations to fill federal judge vacancies. Why ? --It seems there is a supreme court justice out west who proved an executive branch officer cannot select a judicial branch officer ! Who would of thought only an Elector can vote in our judicial branch of government? This is the real meaning of the seperation of powers doctrine. No "Agent" of ours
can select our principle! All agents courts are voluntary! We are exclusive! It had its' origin in Deuteronomy. We are that court of first and last resort - now appealable.
Our Three Justice courts is in bench (banc). So a title 11 bancruptcy is our chancery division
over the agents U.S. Trustees. Any docket by our Creditors creates an automatic stay on all legislative assembly created courts. This is well covered in the D.C. Court Rules. Everything is re-organization (banc-ruptcy) as in federal common law (U.C.C.). Do you see why we set up private security agreements under U.C.C. 1-105 & 1-103 ? The doctrine of law of the place controls simple contract. Parties' power to choose applicable law, territorial application of the act. When you docket your claim in bancruptcy it means a Creditors' claim - not the debtor in an insolvency petition. So all federal judges become respondent under conflict of financial interest.
This is the reason for the automatic stay ! Then our special panel is the only one who could hear
the matter under law of the place in our foreign countries. It becomes ex-parte all the way--We won--the trustees lost. You must get a copy of the D.C. Court rules to see our "exclusive" court.
It is not federal ! It's origin is local government-(traditional). They refer to this in the rules. We
create an admission panel to screen all attorneys. They (panel) have absolute immunity ! Their actions are non-appealable. We supercede the appellate Supreme court in D.C.
The D.C. crowd knows what we have discovered and they are now caught for treason if they
fail to obey our Edicts. They never had authority to send federal judges into our several States.
Our impeachments are valid and cannot be overcome. Any denial of three justice panel is denial
of access to our venue in supreme court. This is why it is the defendant's prerogative to retain his venue. A denial would nullify your right of religion. Also, it would deny you equal right of suffrage.
We are just now getting the system to realize they are culpable for willful acts of treason by suppressing our right to access our judicial branch of government. This is why the three justice
panel was put back into Montana Codes Annotated at 2-2-144. It was not in the 1993 edition.
The State Bar Associations were knowingly pulling these guarantees out of the codes to promote their plans for overthrow of our Republican Form of Government. We have the proof and will prosecute the Liars / lawyers until our Nation is restored. This information is spreading out across
the land. Our right of self-governing is being restored slowly, but surely. The Corporation
Tribunals Are Exposed.
Our People must learn the importance of our judicial conference of the United States
(of America) as found in Title 28, U.S.C. ,331-335, Chapter 15- Conferences and Councils of judges. This was not done by the so-called Common-Law Courts and they had no evidence of
their lawful office. Without that, they had no real judicial immunity to counter-act the prosecution against them. We must make public our Three justice panel with proper oath and bond. This will
be the new Republic from ground zero. Where are all the good and lawful men? Gone to prison every one? May the power and protection of our Creator Yahweh rest upon you as we totally destroy the evil tyrants in our Nation, A-Men!, in Yahshua. L.M.--Special Prosecutor in "other circuit."
Newest Letter to Robert Kelly (American's Bulletin) - 9-7-99
Dear Robert,
This long overdue letter will inform you and readers of T.A.B. about recent admissions and
confessions by the delinquents who are actively engaged in the criminal cover-up concerning my
release date of 3-10-99.
A certain alien agent here at F.C.I. , 501 Gary Hill Road, Edgefield South Carolina country, did
show me a federal form computer code with my release date as March 10th, 1999. This federal
agent said: "It is almost as if you do not exist". "You should not be in here". "I know computer codes
and your release date shows 3-10-99". "I'll look into this".
Approximately one week later, another alien agent here told me, that agent who had given me this
crucial information was no longer at this prison. Please be aware, Our Justices', the so-called
freemen in Montana, were informed by the federal corporation U.S. Marshal's Service agents, we
did not need to attend the trial in federal court at Billings, Montana, nor could they compel us to enter
that court for a so-called sentencing process! Why??
Venue is the key. If you do not waive venue, their federal corporation court cannot obtain subject
matter jurisdiction; albeit an "in rem" attachment was unlawfully placed upon you
Of further interest, be it known that I, Leroy Michael: christian name, nor as nom de guerre
(misnomer) was ever served process of any kind from so-called "charges" in Gallatin county, country
of Montana, as reported in many newspapers. These so-called "charges" have recently been dropped
as more propaganda ploy. The truth remains in the fact and law, Our judgement liens are valid as
well as Our "bills of exchange" are valid, as bona fide tender offer in Our asylum State.
In earlier writings I explained the two supreme courts set in district of Columbia. One is seated as
a corporation court, while the other is seated as a "State court". This letter will expose some
revealing examples in a similar area ---Court of Claims. For those readers who are apt to delve into
this truth further. My reference used for this presentment is West Publishing Company 1996 edition
of "Federal Civil Judicial Procedure and Rules, Title 28 United States Code".
A revealing quote found at section 88 under Historical and Statutory Notes: In Federal Trade
Commission v. Klesner, 1927, 47 S.Ct. 557, 274 U.S. 145, 71 L. Ed. 972, the Supreme Court ruled
"***The parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District [of Columbia] and the Court of
Appeals of the District [of Columbia], on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States
and the circuit courts of appeals, on the other, in the consideration and disposition of cases involving
what among the States would be regarded as within Federal jurisdiciton, is complete".
For comparisons in Court of Claims, there are four chapters in Title 28, U.S.C., dealing with those
two different Kinds of courts. Look to chapters 7, 51, 91, and 165. I will present clues using their
own confessions and admissions, with final truth resting on the reader himself, or herself.
At section 173 it says: The principal office of the United States Court of Federal Claims (i.e.
USCFC) shall be in the District of Columbia, but the Court of Federal Claims (i.e. CFC) may hold
court at it's pleasure. Under section 171 Historical Notes at Change of Name, a quote: "(1) the
'United States Claims Court' shall be deemed to refer to the 'United States Court of Federal Claims';
and the 'Claims Court' shall be deemed to refer to the 'Court of Federal Claims'".
Next, it is admitted under Continuation of Organization of Court, it shall be construed as a
continuation of existing law as of section 1 of Act June 25th, 1948. Under section 177 it shows any
judge of USCFC removed from office shall not be permitted at anytime to practice before the Court
of Federal Claims.
For the readers proof as to which court is highest in authority, see section 2522 on appeals for
review of a decision of the USCFC, a notice of appeal goes to the clerk of CFC.
At section 2520 the USCFC imposes a fee not exceeding $120.00, but the historical Notes show
the Court of Claims as "taxation of costs" under section 2412(a) which goes to section 1920 taxation
of costs as in common law actions.
Section 798 shows more of the character of the court, where subsection (a) says the USCFC will
hold court in Washington, District of Columbia, yet subsection (b) shows a judge of the CFC
conducting proceedings, including evidentiary hearings and trials, in a foreign country whose laws do
not prohibit such proceedings.
Another admission as to which court is higher in authority see section 1500 where the USCFC
does not have jurisdiction where a plaintiff has an action or process against the United States.
Concerning proceedings generally (i.e. common law) see section 2503(c) where the judges of the
CFC shall fix times for trials, administer oaths, examine witnesses, receive evidence, and enter
dispositive judgements. Hearings shall, if convenient, be held in the counties where the witnesses
reside. At subsection (b) the CFC makes it's own rules.
For an explanation of Our Justices' authority to impeach a federal imposter judge, We refer to
section 2509, as Congressional reference cases. Subsection (b) shows the CFC shall have authority
for all acts necessary or proper to carry out their duties and subpoena power. A quote: "None of the
rules, rulings, findings or conclusions authorized by this section shall be subject to judicial review".
This means the CFC acts as a court of first and last resort under common law!
Now, some question may arise upon this next section, but keep in mind the CFC has final review
over the USCFC as aforesaid in these presentments.
At section 2513 is title Unjust conviction and imprisonment. Subsection (a) suggests any person
suing under section 1495 of this title, which shows USCFC, must allege and prove that:
(1) That his conviction has been reversed or set aside on the ground that he is not guilty of the
offence of which he was convicted - - - or that he has been pardoned upon the stated ground of
innocence and unjust conviction and (2) He did not commit any of the acts charged or his acts,
deeds, or ommissions in connection with such charge constituted no offence against the United
States, or any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, and he did not by misconduct or neglect
cause or bring about his own prosecution.
At subsection (b) it says proof of the requisite facts shall be by a certificate of the court or pardon
wherein such facts are alleged to appear, and other evidence thereof shall not be received.
What does this mean? Our CFC has authority to issue a pardon due to common law, it is the
higher court and proper in a foreign country. Furthermore the CFC judgement is not reviewable in
another court. This is Our government requisition, where Our Justices' Courts enter in all the
exculpatory evidence which was not allowed to be admitted in the federal corporation United
States sham proceedings. There are many more points and quotes which could be added to this
explanation of the two seperate "Claim Courts". The main concept to grasp, is the fact Our Justices'
of the quorum have been silent for nearly eighty years in Our Nation in America. The aliens are in
an extreme panic, as these truths continue to emerge, dispite the tyranny, trespass, torture and
treason.
For the astute reader, be advised, Justus Township has not expired.
Yahshua is the way!
Chief Justice Leroy Michael